Riis and Saxo Bank – Tinkoff try to use Contador’s Star Status to Avoid Sanctions

Alberto Contador, Bjarne Riis, and Saxo Bank – Tinkoff have gone on record that [Contador will not be attending][art] the Tour of Bejing unless his World Tour points count toward his team.

### A Little Background
Last year Contador was [found guilty][guilt] of having Clenbutenol in his system. This conviction for doping removed means he lost his 2010 Tour de France victory and all results earned during the banned period which started June 21 2010 (the trial back dated the ban).

Doping sanctions also extend to the points a rider may accumulate for placement in races. These points are also applied to the team that the rider is on. Teams in the top 18 gain automatic entry to all [World Tour races][rank].

### Why they’re pulling the star card
This season Saxo Bank – Tinkoff was team 18. They are sitting last of all ProTour teams. If they drop down to the next league they will have to rely on wild card entries for the big races like the Giro d’Italia and the Tour de France. That can’t make their sponsors happy. They want coverage and the way to get coverage is to race the big races.

With Contador winning the Vuelta this last week, in style, he is at the forefront of fan’s minds. That makes this the perfect time to try and use his star power to bully the UCI in to removing the 2 year point ban.

I love watching Contador race. He is certainly the best Grand Tour rider of his generation, but I think the UCI should stand firm. I don’t think it’s worth running back 10 years to catch doping cheats, but we should be putting the screws to any dopers that are caught. The prospect of doping sanctions need to be severe enough that no one will even think about it. The consequences to teams needs to be high enough that they are going to make sure their riders are not doping and never encourage it. Contador doesn’t deserve to get a pass because he’s a star. That’s just going to get the UCI in to another situation like they have with Lance Armstrong now. Much of the public believes he used his star power to bully the UCI.

If Contador gets the UCI to back down then it will be fact, not just belief, that he was able to bully the UCI. Who will try to bully next? Bradley Wiggins? Phillipe Gilbert? The UCI has enough problems without making it blatant to everyone that they are push overs if you are popular enough.

I’m actually a bit disappointed in Contador. I thought he had more class than this. Maybe it’s the sponsors putting the pressure on the team? If so Riis needs to step up and protect his team from the pressure.

Get back to racing and stop all this political drama.

[guilt]: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/sports/cycling/alberto-contador-found-guilty-of-doping.html
[rank]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCI_World_Ranking#Ranking_events
[art]: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/contador-will-not-attend-pointless-tour-of-beijing

3 Replies to “Riis and Saxo Bank – Tinkoff try to use Contador’s Star Status to Avoid Sanctions”

  1. It’s weird to allow racing, but no points.

    Also, in regard to Beijing and other quickly approved World Tour races:

    Corruption At The Heart Of The UCI – http://bit.ly/Qh6P9Y

    Tour of Hangzhou cancelled amid corruption allegations – http://bit.ly/PeIxfx

    It seems that UCI and McQaid cronies have a conflict of interest when it comes to punishing “stars”.

    1. I think that no points ups the punishment for riders and tries to spread it to teams as well. Contador is a bit less desirable for a team if he doesn’t bring points along. It’s still totally possible for a team to turn a blind eye to doping and ‘use up’ a rider then leave them out to dry because they don’t have points.

      I think that the UCI needs to devise a system that penalizes teams as well when a rider is doping. Teams need to take a lead, like Garmin Sharp, and push hard for no doping at all. At the very least a team should be required to demonstrate that they were doing everything in their power to ensure that doping was not happening. Stuff like their own testing. If they can prove that they have worked hard to keep dopers off the team then they should get a pass at punishment. Right now I don’t think that teams do enough to make sure that there is no doping.

      I don’t think that they’re encouraging it (at least not as much as it once was) but they need to do more.

  2. Yeah, lack of point accumulation is meant to be a punishment for the rider – making them less desirable for a team to hire.

    For riders with marginal performance, this would be huge.

    The AC case is kind of different. He’s a Grand Tour winner – past, present, and future. Plus, he has a huge fanbase which translates to continued sponsor value in spite of his transgressions. This also means that big races would want him to be there. At a certain point, perhaps race organizers and team might even feel that UCI accreditation is unnecessary. Thus, the creation of a breakaway cycling league.

    It sure is a complicated game being played. Bottom-line, we do need to have the rules-of-the-game clearly defined both for fans and racers in a very transparent manner.

    What really amuses me though, is how the UCI’s rule is coming back to bite them (McQuaid and cronies) in “their” races.

Comments are closed.